- Sat Feb 08, 2020 8:26 pm
You're right. The meta would be way more fun and diverse if people played snatch steal, delinquent duo, harpies feather duster, and maxx 'c' at three. Konami should really reboot the banlist entirely and make a new one. And then one after that. And after that. And after that. And then obviously just reboot it again. And then make a new banlist. And then one after that. And after that. Having no banlist just makes the game even more toxic - having full power spellbooks, dragon rulers, zoodiac, teledad, chaos, etc. Then you'd get Gouki FTK, Yata Garasu Lockdown, Tempest Magician FTK, etc. There is a reason Konami make a banlist - to stop the game from being unfair and so people like yourself stop complaining. I am not trying to be hurtful I am just stating facts. People need to realise Konami are real people and do what real people do. Every once in a while they let the public decide stuff due to too many complaints - and when the public do what they wanted, they start complaining about other things. I hate the fact that I have to rant about the flawed logic of letting every broken deck run wild that people originally complained about being unfair - as a means of making the game 'fair' again. Bare in mind that I always have to explain this to just you. Not because I'm maliciously targeting you for it - its because you're the only one that says this is a good idea. Going back to the article - I think its pretty good. Griffin is an interesting writer and I enjoy his way of analyzing. Good Job!